View Single Post
  #12  
Old 12-31-2005, 09:02 PM
7stud 7stud is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 143
Default Re: Reverse Implied Odds?

[ QUOTE ]
Fold is correct, right?

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With that many limpers, would you guys still raise it, or would it become a call at this point?

[/ QUOTE ]

In “Small Stakes Hold’em”, AJo is classified as a Big Offsuit Broadway hand. In that section(p. 73) it says,

[ QUOTE ]
You can open with any of these hands from any position. Raise any of these hands if it has not been raised.

[/ QUOTE ]

So, according to the authors, not only is folding incorrect, your first thought should be to raise. However, in a footnote at the bottom of the page, the authors recommend that if 5 or 6 people have already limped in, then consider just limping in as well due to the fact that your preflop edge is small against so many opponents, and just calling can gain some strategic advantages that will help you make more money after the flop.

[ QUOTE ]
Our hand may be best now - but chances of our one pair catching hand winning on the showdown are slim and we will just bloat the pot on further streets and lose on river more often than not - correct?

[/ QUOTE ]
You aren't sitting at a table and playing someone heads up and only getting paid 1:1 on each of your bets, where you would need to win more often than not for the hand to be profitable. In your example, if everyone stayed to the river, then you would be getting paid 5:1 on your bets, which means you would just need to win more than 1 time out of 6 to make money.

Consider these two examples:

1) You sit down at a roulette table where the wheel has 38 numbers on it. You can bet $1 on any number, and if you win you will be paid $1. Should you play? Why or why not?

2) Same roulette table, but this time it costs $1 to bet on a number, and if you win you will be paid $50. Should you play? Why or why not?
Reply With Quote