Re: Interesting ruling..
[ QUOTE ]
in this case, the house should cover the 125$ that the player would have been forced to put in if not for the dealer error. Whoever fucks up, then thats who pays. Its the dealers job to count the chips down.
[/ QUOTE ]
The house just isn't going to do that unless the error was completely their fault. In this case the error was in large part Player A's.
[ QUOTE ]
And leave the river to what it was. What if he sees the river and decides he doesnt want to call the extra 125$ because it would not have helped his hand?
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think anyone believes the river card should come back.
~ Rick
|