Re: 55: Value Calling the Assumed Best Hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts?
[/ QUOTE ]
You're gonna feel really, really dumb when BB folds his missed flush draw and you beat the KJo that would've gladly given you half his stack.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why not equally assume its the other way around?...why not put BB on the weak K and UTG on the sooted connectors?
Where in the hand/betting does one of these guys lean more toward the weak K and the other to the FD etc...?
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Thoughts?
[/ QUOTE ]
You're gonna feel really, really dumb when BB folds his missed flush draw and you beat the KJo that would've gladly given you half his stack.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why not equally assume its the other way around?...why not put BB on the weak K and UTG on the sooted connectors?
Where in the hand/betting does one of these guys lean more toward the weak K and the other to the FD etc...?
[/ QUOTE ]
If I know BB has a King I would rather raise. If he has two pair he probably raises turn as people play two pair very fast.
Am I crazy about thinking about pushing here?
|