Re: OOT rules clarification
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Now you could argue that they posted the information and the couple in question did not but I would counter that the vegas trip was advertised as a 2+2 and OOT get together and that its reasonable to expect any results of said trip to make its way to 2+2 and OOT. This of course is the forum where we all communicate regularly.
[/ QUOTE ]
After the June trip, several people got angry about certain details making their way back onto the boards. It was generally agreed that there are certain lines and areas that it's best to use discretion, or at least check with the original poster.
I'm just saying, there is a precedent regarding 2p2 trips, and it's that people's privacy should be respected if it's questionable whether they'd want something coming out into the open.
[/ QUOTE ]
I find this terribly hypocritical, but if the precedence HAS been established, it should be respected. Note that I am far removed from the OOT inner circle, so my views are influenced accordingly.
[/ QUOTE ]
Here's what happened after the trip in june.
One poster made a post with very explicit detail.
In that very thread, people said "dude, that's not cool" and others agreed.
If you'll note- save one thread that was a horrible idea- (A thread that had a lot of people who were in Vegas yelling at PITTM)People didn't share a whole ton as to what happened in November specifically because of what was discussed regarding the June trip.
|