Re: Suggestions
[ QUOTE ]
i dont see whats wrong with chops. Tournys are for the players not for the spectators.
[/ QUOTE ]
Who said anything about this being for the spectators' benefit? My point is that, as these tournaments are falling under the 'ISOP' banner, the rules on deals should be consistent across all of them. Some sites do not allow deals to be struck in their tournaments and are unlikely to be able to handle being forced to do so for one event. Therefore, the only consistent rule which could realistically be applied is a no deal policy.
The whole point of this suggestion is to ensure players know the score, as the issue of deals is bound to come up at each event. Knowing what the decision is in advance of the tournament is a policy for the benefit of the players, not the railbirds.
Sheriff
|