Re: My first complaint about Harrington on Hold \'em.
Well, I think there's almost nothing in poker that couldn't in some sense be called over-simplified.
Sure, the book could have spent more time dicussing the finer points of continuation bets (and just about everything else for that matter) and instead of there being two volumes we'd have 3 or 4 or ...well, it could literally go on almost forever.
Having said that, I think when the problems are studied closely, they do a very good job of fleshing out the spectrum of continuation bet type scenarios.
|