[AKQJ10]

[ QUOTE ]
$1 per hand is way too high proportion-wise for 5/10. if you're playing 1000/2000 then $1 per hand is pretty insignificant.
correct me if i'm wrong, or if i missed your point.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, you caught my point and reiterated it. Chesspain made a sweeping generality: "I can't see how it could be profitable to overcome a $1/hand charge in a limit game, no matter how fishy the game." And I'm pointing out that it's not the absolute size of the rake that matters, but the proportional rake.

Perhaps it really is unbeatable at $5/10, no matter how fishy. So I'm probably in "violent agreement" with everyone here including chesspain.