View Single Post
  #10  
Old 12-23-2003, 02:34 AM
Soleo Soleo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 47
Default Re: Yes, look here... Re: Isn\'t Party rake still better than UB? N/M

Hrrrr.... For $3-6 number for UB must be $15,247. There are another steps than for $2-4 in their table (also there are same mistake at $3-6 UB column in spreadsheet).

So for full table with 6-10 players (9.6-9.7 on average) best rake for these limits is at PokerStars
$2-4 - $0.86 per hand
$3-6 - $1.26

ParadisePoker (same as "old" Party's scale)
$2-4 - $0.89 per hand
$3-6 - $1.36

PartyPoker (current scale)
$2-4 - $0.99
$3-6 - $1.46

UltimateBet (or Cryptologic where scale is the same)
$2-4 - $1.21
$3-6 - $1.55

Pay attention that this is projected average numbers of rake per hand for full table games assuming that all 20,000 pots used for this calculation are equal at all 4 sites. However actual pot sizes at some sites (Paradise) are smaller because of tighter games, so average rake per hand will be even smaller.

If to be serious there are no real use for these numbers [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] (Out of comparing Party old-new rake).
Reply With Quote