[hmkpoker]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I'm pleased to see support for my earlier insistance that panspermia is a scientific theory (in contrast to ID) in the fact that a summary of the status of this theory is in the current edition of "Scientific American".


[/ QUOTE ]

Ha, knew it. I've come to the conclusion that any explanation for anything, so long as God isn't involved, can be made scientific, even FSM.

[/ QUOTE ]

Explanations for God can be considered scientific; Christian Science, ID, etc. It's all in the eyes of the beholder.