[MicroBob]

I guess I just don't understand what good 'blocking it' is supposed to do.

If you don't want to play it then just don't click on the stupid button.
Just the same as if you don't want to blow your whole $5k roll by 'taking a shot' at the 100/200 game then just don't take a seat at the table.

Is Party supposed to block the 100/200 tables too for those players who are upset that they were just too tempted to take their shots there in the first place?


It reminds me of the super-addicted gamblers (like slots and craps and such) out there who ask the casino to bar them from ever playing again (and sometimes will even sue the casino because they failed to impose that ban on them...or because they kept the addict on their mailing list for coupons, etc).

Should some talented poker-player tell the casino to ban them from the craps tables. They make all this money in the poker-room...but somehow it's the casinos fault that they blow it all on the craps table.


I just don't see the point of this whole debate about 'blocking the buttons'.
If you wanted to play online blackjack there were about a million places you could have been doing this BEFORE party added it to their site.
yeah yeah yeah....but on party it's "right there". But that's only a difference of a few button clicks from the other online-blackjack places .


So if gambloor (and others) are so prone to this party-blackjack thing...then why weren't they already playing online-blackjack before I wonder (seriously...just curious).