Death Penalty Article
Can people confirm that I'm not seeing things? Have a really just read an article about refinements to the death penalty in a POKER magazine.
I'm not objecting to this on the merits of David's argument, but that it just doesn't belong in such a magazine. Mason has indicated on a number of occasions that this magazine was going to be of far higher quality (in terms of advice and strategy) than other poker mags out there. Granted, the advice in other publications is often second-rate or poorly-explained, but not once have I seen them veer so off topic with an article as in this case.
Ed arguments in defense of Barron's article last month eventually had me on his side. In this case, I very much doubt this will happen.
I still think that the content of most articles is top-notch. It's just a shame to see something so irrelevant included in the issue.
What do others think about it?
John
|