View Single Post
  #9  
Old 12-20-2005, 11:30 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Psycology of poker

I have mentioned before, that while POP might be a good read, it reminds me too much of Dr. Phil or Oprah or something

First the devastating perils of the LAG style of playing (complete with stereotyped describtions of LAG's ... Snowboarders, Mafiosy .. and so on )

then ...


Until the conclusion that if you play TAG, then you are a good boy ... yes, goood boy


Then repeat the above like a zillion times, and you have POP


Feeney is cool though, allthough it really isn't a psychology book (good parts on tilt, emotions and playing maniacs though)
Reply With Quote