[imported_luckyme]

[ QUOTE ]
Very familiar, I wonder how few of us there are who take this type of approach.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think there's a chunk of related views out there but many of them would be uncomfortable with my "treat as true" or your "test other views against them". Most people ( outside the very self-selecting grouop on SMP) need a stronger grip on something than what either of us start from.
[ QUOTE ]
Mine are a bit different and I don't treat them as true but test any other view against them. Unless some other view can actually be differentiated from 'mine' then I assume its the same.
I call 'mine' humble skeptical realism. That is that:
1) something that seems like me currently exists
2) a real world exists that I can interact with
3) I am a non-special part of this real world

So far, everything that I can understand about the world seems at least as understandable under this view than under any other.

[/ QUOTE ]

Darn.. now I want a name for mine.
Flexible Occamism with a Twist of Reality.

[ QUOTE ]
Unless some other view can actually be differentiated from 'mine' then I assume its the same.

[/ QUOTE ]

An expansion on this process and what you mean my 'same' would be interesting and helpful,
thanks, luckyme