I've paid some experienced 2+2ers to review my hand histories, out of a very limited set (4 or 5 complete SnGs) the comments I got were "perfect HU" and "too aggressive on bubble".

My winning distribution over 450 $22s is:
1st: 14.5%
2nd: 11.5%
3rd: 9.9%
4th: 12.6%

Over my first 100 SnGs at the $33s netted:
1st: 13.0%
2nd: 7.0%
3rd: 5.0%
4th: 12.0%

I think this is kinda meaningless as it's over only 100sngs, and I luckboxed many times in a row for a lot of the 1st places.

Sometimes I feel like I'm not pushing on the bubble enough (don't want to risk it all on T7o when AA might be my next hand... bad, I know), other times I'm going nuts with 92o. I guess my pushing or not is based more on how often others are calling, or if the big stack is to my left, etc. I'm "feeling" my way around, and I guess my results so far aren't terrible; but as I'm focusing on this specific part of my game, I'm finding it impossible to really pin down where my mistakes are. I simply don't know what assumptions to use when reviewing my bubble/ITM play.

Thanks for taking the time to respond, Tewall.
Baz