Re: Annoying hand with a short stack.
[ QUOTE ]
You are missing my point.
[/ QUOTE ]
No, I'm not, though you're right about shorty not having odds of course.
[ QUOTE ]
This is an example of why it can be a disadvantage to have a deep stack.
[/ QUOTE ]
No, it's an example of why it's bad to have a maniac acting behind when you're trying to flop a winner with a dominated hand. Stack sizes are irrelevant.
Note that while the outcome disadvantaged you, it equally helped big stack KK who had the best hand. Collectively, there was no disadvantage to big stacks.
And the short stack still got all in with the worst hand, without odds, making a play he never would have made without Miller's book and a short stack.
The only person disadvantaged here was shorty. All the rest is results oriented. Yes I agree that short stacks can disadvantage big stacks collectively, but this is not an example of it.
|