Re: Dover Intelligent Design case -- judge rules for plaintiffs
you dont need to insult me. if you read your initial response, it does not even make proper sense in responding to my question. but i didnt bother to point that out. anyway, if i misread, then you have clarified - the gov warned against 'support' of a religion. did this mean that prayer in school was forbidden in the 18th century? i very much doubt that. again, if you can give me good evidence that the e clause was used that way THEN in that time, i will listen. i am 96% certain (even more certain than Sklanksy's 90% or so belief in no God) that prayer in public school was acceptable in the 18th century. perhaps, God forbid, even Creationism was taught.
|