[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Because it is in the best of their interest. The rake of multitabling winning players does not compensate for the deterioration of the games. Fish get hammered quicker, need more reloads or leave earlier (bust).

[/ QUOTE ]

Lord knows I'm no Econ major, but this seems to me akin to saying if we get rid of all the rich people, the poor people will be that much richer.

The fact of the matter is winning players are the foundation of ANY good poker room, period. Otherwise, you have a constant strwam of layers buying in, losing, and leaving. If the top 10% of all players left Party right now, they would likely lose 30%-50% of their rake IMMEDIATELY, and all that would happen is the mid-level players would now be making the $$$, and the bad players would MAYBE play 10-20% longer. No chance it makes up for the rake good players accrue, period. ENd of story.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not getting why the top 10% of players would leave if the games remain as soft as they are.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh.

It's a theoretical situation....