[Daliman]

Sounds good. I recommend scrapping the $200 getting better value then the $500 players aspect as obviously playing a $500 player wasn't all that much of a handicap.

Might as well pencil me in vs Lacky either way, though.

Now, on to see how good Venetian's blackjack is....


[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]


P.S. Well, it seems one of our more corpulent posters was confused by my initial statements, so just to be clear, I want the $200 slots still available, but as structured before, they had a full value crack at 16x their $200, whereas $500 players got less value, since the $200 players water the prize pool down. It think it's safe to say from previous results that many low-roll guys have game.