[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The usual reasons? Because villain might be on a draw, our hand might be best, if our hand is no good there are a ton of outs and villain will not necessarily c/r.

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah, but...

* this flop is coordinated and likely to have hit BB
* a checkraise sucks here. we have just enough outs to call, but not enough to feel very good about it.
* you can induce a bluff on the end from a busted draw or other random hand that peeled on the flop. usually that bet will go in either way on the river.
* you might extract a couple bets on the river if you hit a Q and BB was slowplaying JT or something

[/ QUOTE ]
Wynton is right...

Checking behind with outs is good if we're not likely to have the best hand. That's not the case here.

[ QUOTE ]
* a checkraise sucks here. we have just enough outs to call, but not enough to feel very good about it.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is just wrong because:

1) Poker is about making correct decisions, not about feeling good or bad when raised.

2) We're not getting c/r'ed 100% of the time.

If villain had just called or folded (which happens sometimes here), this wouldn't have been an issue.