View Single Post
  #23  
Old 08-19-2005, 07:44 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: An Open Challenge

[ QUOTE ]
Here's a question for you, DVault. Has the U.S. military turned down anyone who was willing and able to serve on the basis of not needing volunteers? I can't think of a time. So your premise that the military is suddenly starving for volunteers is misleading because the military is always starving for more volunteers.

[/ QUOTE ]

If that's true, and let's just assume it is, because I have no knowledge to the contrary - then the only implication is that you ought to be willing to go fight in any war that you also support; which is what I've been saying all along.

Also, if this is true, then read over the post q/q started about the army missing it's recruiting goals and see how many posters claimed they "weren't needed".

Sounds like we agree, they are needed.

[ QUOTE ]
Now could you hop on down from your high horse and be done with the name-calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. It may be name-calling, but it's not name-calling without a purpose. War supporters should be reconsidering their support for the war, in light of the fact they're hypocrites.
Reply With Quote