[ QUOTE ]
This thread sucks. You don't even go into the real issues with the moon landing. Just all the standard oft-repeated BS.

Apparently one of the real issues was that the cameras used on the moon were supposedly off the shelf consumer type cameras. There's no theoretical justification for such a camera to be able to withstand the harsh environment conditions on the moon (mainly high temperature) and it's among many questions presented to NASA, but never addressed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Do you have any proof for this assertion? As a rebuttal, apparently Fox themselves, in their 'moon hoax' special, actually interviewed the guy who designed the cameras specifically for the astronauts!

[ QUOTE ]
The program goes farther than this, though: they actually contacted the man who designed the cameras for the astronauts. When they asked him why the pictures were always perfect, he hemmed and hawed, and finally admitted he had no answer for that.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/f...tml#doubletime

BTW, here is a NASA page about the issue, where they answer some questions:

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm