Re: 2+2 + 2+2 + 2+2 = ???
"Thinking for Tommy ..."
Please, by all means, do. Your post is spookily dead on. Especially this part:
"[On the turn] ... I still don't know where Ulysses is at. (check/bet/fold). Ok, that's good."
And even more so this:
"[on the river] If I check he may give up and check behind. I doubt he would keep betting overcards after my actions on the previous streets. However, he probably will call with all sorts of pocket pairs because the size of the pot, but he may not bet a pocket pair less than jacks. I'll bet. If he raises I've got a new problem, but folding might be in order. How's that sound Tommy?"
Like sweet music.
Tommy
|