[Roadstar]

[ QUOTE ]
Hyper-aggressive play won money at .5/1, 1/2, and 1/2 short.

Hyper-aggressive play does not win money at 2/4.

Be careful with trying to explode all over the loose passives there. Sometimes more passive lines win more money.

I don't know if you play hyper-aggressively. I did and it took me 5k hands to figure out that that isn't the way to beat 2/4.

At 3/6 short, however, I think that hyper-aggressive play is best.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very interesting, I think my 1/2 6 max win rate is (unsustainably) high right now because I learned to play hyperaggressive (while still considering opponents and board texture of course).

So for 2/4 full - do you start inducing bluffs with check/call lines (OOP presumably)?

As an aside - did you jump from 1/2 6 max to 3/6 6 max or did you go to 2/4 6 max at pokerstars or something? I find I do pretty well in 6 max because I can and enjoy reading my opponents better (I 2 table at most when playing 6 max)... or it could be near-term luck..

Does the same winning style at 1/2 6 max work at 3/6 6 max?

Again thank you for everyones responses (Wook your link is great)