[cardcounter0]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think most people question micro-evolution. We can observe micro-evolution. It's macro-evolution that theists question. That's why your argument is a strawman.

[/ QUOTE ]

So the intelligent designer was only smart enough to use evolution on a micro-level, but not smart enough to make it work on the macro-level?

[ QUOTE ]
We can observe micro-evolution.

[/ QUOTE ]

If only the intelligent designer had created observers with better powers of observation, then maybe macro-evolution would work too.
[img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

I am assuming that the dividing line between micro- and macro- evolution is defined by what "theists" can observe.

Which brings up another question - what are these "theists", I thought one of the fundamental claims of intelligent design was that it was a SCIENCE not a RELIGION, so shouldn't we be depending on the observations of SCIENTISTS, not the claims of THEISTS?
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]