Re: Unwise to employ higher level psychology at 200 NL?
I haven't read the responses but the title of your post and another post you made a day or two ago (something like "is this too high level thinking for 1/2?") indicate a flaw in your approach to the games. If you make a play that goes over your opponent's head, its not his fault for being unable to recognize that you're representing great strength; its your fault for not recognizing such a play will not work against him (like the old adage that you should never bluff calling stations).
It is possible that these couple posts are not representative of your overall approach to these games but the arrogance in your title choices leads me to the biggest problem with your game is that you are not accurately assessing at what levels your opponents are thinking.
Just my .02
|