[ZenMusician]

[ QUOTE ]
This clearly doesn't belong in a poker magazine. And the idea of galvanizing a forum of poker players to support a specific political cause with one voice is absurd. Do you see why?

[/ QUOTE ]

Great...a poker PAC! (so that's why we love polls so much)

I'm not sure I am going to bite on this one. My read on David
is that he enjoys posting topics with especially inflammatory
subject matter, (see Psychology forum "God" posts et al.)

Whether it is to leverage his position of power–albeit in a
somewhat exclusive community–to promote his personal
philosophical viewpoints or to harvest the inevitable and
predictable debate to color the website is my question.

Whatever the reason and intention, the end result seems to
do little more than detract from the potential well of gaming
knowledge that is David Sklansky...are you getting bored with
monotone subject matter?

I own almost all of your books and the only problem I usually
find is the horrid scans of those cards (I work in publishing, ha!)
Other than that I treasure the knowledge.

If I would like deviation from a stream of poker theory and discussion,
I can download the latest Bill Fillmaff video.

Your (devoted, seriously) fan,

- ZEN