Re: The arguement that recently convinced me of god\'s existence
[ QUOTE ]
But, he doesn’t say anything of the origin of life. There is nothing in his methodology that leads one to a conclusion that God won’t be at the end of the tunnel.
[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No. Why would he?
The Blind Watchmaker isn't an argument for atheism. It's a refutation of a specific argument for theism.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think you misread what I wrote. Without the double negatives, I’ll re-write. His methodology does not eliminate a god at the end of the tunnel. That a god is/or is not the source of life. Or do I need to continue reading? What I gathered was on page 164 and the probabilities of life is what he talks about.
|