View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-11-2005, 01:18 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why limit instead of no limit?

[ QUOTE ]
nobody is making 100$/hr one-tabling 1-2$ NL.

[/ QUOTE ] That much I know. My presumption is that NL is more volatile than limit. Is this a correct statement?
I know what it takes to earn money in gaming, grinding out small edges, with lots of volatility. I come from a serious blackjack background, where a $5000 bank is required to earn $25 an hour. I know what it takes to earn money with small edges. I want to get into something that will allow me to earn some money on a daily or weekly basis when i am not on one of my once a month blackjack trips. Since I am just getting started I want to get into the right game. So which is it, limit or NL.

I understand solid limit $2-$4 play will earn approx $8 per 100 hands... roughly $16 an hour 2-Tabling (all i am capable of doing so far). will NL earn a solid player more than that with the same or less volatility? this is assuming I were a solid player, which I will be some day, but I am not yet.

Thanks again for the help
-Shaggy
Reply With Quote