View Single Post
  #39  
Old 09-04-2004, 07:14 PM
Stu Pidasso Stu Pidasso is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 779
Default Re: Facts at last.

[ QUOTE ]
Again, explain how these '03 numbers "aren't that bad".

[/ QUOTE ]

I should not have to spoon feed this to you cardcounter.

Anyways the largest and "most bad" deficit (in terms of GDP) occurred in 1983. It was a whooping 6% of GDP. The 2003 deficit, according to the CBO, came in at 3.5% of GDP. Heres why these '03 numbers "aren't that bad". I'll put it in bold in consideration for those of you out there stricken with ADD.

3.5% is much less than 6%

If thats to difficult to understand, perhaps you will understand it if put present it another way. Here goes....

6% is much more than 3.5%

And there you have it. Mathmatical proof that the 2003 deficit is "not that bad".

[ QUOTE ]
The ecomony is shrinking, jobs are being outsourced, growth in productivity is not there....

[/ QUOTE ]

Its your turn to post a link substantiating your position. Good Luck to you.

Stu
Reply With Quote