Villian was interesting. He was a maniac preflop, (76/35), but postflop he was actually fairly decent. My table image was good, I'd been showing down winners and folding a fair bit preflop, (crappy cards).
I find that against decent postflop players the continuation bet can be a bit obvious. Does anybody else do this? Standard? Boring? Merry Xmas as well to all you guys and gals.
PokerStars 2/4 Hold'em (6 handed)
converter
Preflop: Hero is CO with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">
1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">
3 folds</font>, UTG calls.
Flop: (5.50 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, Hero checks.
Turn: (2.75 BB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">UTG bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>,