Re: The case against RB
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one that did not understand the point of this? What exactly are you trying to say? You raise pretty cards in position?
[/ QUOTE ]
That having fleets of profitable 8-tablers subsidised by RB creates table textures that aren't very exciting for the fish because you no longer have to play as much poker to take enough money off the table to generate a profit.
[/ QUOTE ]
I would agree. A lot of fish create their own excitement though, forget what the rest of the table is doing.
We all know rakeback is crap for the fish. Not only do they not take advantage of it, it tends to attract a certain type of player to a site. If party changed to contributed rakeback all of these tight players would take a hit, that is for sure.
|