Re: why does sklansky spend so much time on the philos section?and oth
Clearly nobody in this forum has come anywhere near even minimal comprehension of what i am trying to say. some have resorted to ad hominem attacks, w/o specifically and positively proving anything i've said to be blatantly contradictory. on the other hand, i have shown several examples of blatant inconsistencies in the pseudo-logic of some of your responses. it's amazing how arrogant people can be when it is clear they know next to nothing of any value. perhaps there are atheists who can provide a more formidable challenge (by formidable i mean capable of reading above a 6th grade level, and understanding even the most simplistic and basic moral implications of atheism). these atheists simply do not exist yet on this thread. arrogant ignoramii is all i have come across so far.
|