Re: Barron, dude, wtf?
Fair enough. I still think it seems a bit strange that you know for a fact L4 doesn't have the nuts, then you know for a fact that L2 will call 1 but not 2 more bets in this huge pot, then you're not exactly sure whether L4 has the nuts or not.
If there's a possibility that L2 will fold for 1 more -or- call 2 more and your original read on L4 is at all accurate then I still think a raise is in order.
But I see how the presence of L2 affects the situation. Thanks for the clarification, I trust you because you were there. Sorry for calling a Slotboom on you!
/mc
|