Re: My Take on the Magazine
This is somewhat different than what Mason has indicated in the past, in my opinion.
He's been clear that he expects the 2+2 magazine to be the highest quality publication. That includes having better advice than a certain other magazine. I know I've seen threads in the past where authors here have criticized the play of hands by other mag authors, for being incorrect advice, -EV, etc.
So how is that different in this case? Presenting a different line is one thing. Publishing an article that seems to rely on some very shaky assumptions in order to make the math work, is something else.
I'm not being critical here really. Just expressing my thoughts. I do think as editor that if you have thoughts on the article, you are somewhat obligated to explain what concepts it included to make it worth publishing.
|