[Scuba Chuck]

[ QUOTE ]
i would hope a bot that can go through a field like this would know better than all this miniraising nonsense.

[/ QUOTE ]

A shift in power. This is how you manage an aggressive bigstack.

PokerStars Game #2502398111: Tournament #10017947, Hold'em No Limit - Level XXIV (30000/60000) - 2005/09/05 - 05:27:21 (ET)
Table '10017947 385' Seat #4 is the button
Seat 4: toprose (3708252 in chips)
Seat 8: Snow Leopard (3946748 in chips)
toprose: posts the ante 3000
Snow Leopard: posts the ante 3000
toprose: posts small blind 30000
Snow Leopard: posts big blind 60000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
toprose: raises 60000 to 120000
Snow Leopard: raises 180000 to 300000
toprose: calls 180000
*** FLOP *** [3s Th Ks]
Snow Leopard: bets 900000
toprose: raises 2505252 to 3405252 and is all-in
Snow Leopard: folds
toprose collected 2406000 from pot
toprose: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2406000 | Rake 0
Board [3s Th Ks]
Seat 4: toprose (button) (small blind) collected (2406000)
Seat 8: Snow Leopard (big blind) folded on the Flop


Is it just me, or do you guys dislike the flop lead bet here? If you flopped a pair of Ks here, wouldn't you check? Thus, a c/r is more in line with a better bluffing line?