Re: You are absolutely correct.
To review.
1) I offer my opinion on Ed's.
2) Without addressing my opinion, you interject a rhetorical tangent propped upon a misleading statement. I correct you, but still address your main point by stating my opinion of such.
3) You respond with another misleading statement, continued blather, and a lecture on corporate ethics (something I apparently can't understand). I again offer correction and address your main point.
4) Now, in Full Superscillious Twit Mode, you blather, still not addressing what I've said, but rather relying upon my ignorance and naivete as a point of disembarkation for things that apparently need saying about media conglomerates. I respond by trying to get you to actually take a position contra to what I've written.
5) You lose interest -- taking the hard way out, by changing the sense of "interesting" that you originally used as a sneer in an attempt to score yet another cheap point.
Congrats
*plonk*
|