Considering the strigent calling requirements (most people aren't this tight), consider the following:

KK+, AKo VERSUS

AA 84.670% to win Six different ways.
AA, AKs 66.818% to win Ten different ways.
KK+ 64.551% to win Twelve different ways.
KK+, AKs 58.258% to win Sixteen different ways.
AA, AKo 51.856% to win Sixteen different ways.
QQ+ 51.570% to win Eighteen different ways.
KK+, AKo 50.000% to win Twenty four different ways.
QQ+, AKs 49.672% to win Twenty two different ways.
AA, AKs, AKo 49.465% to win Twenty two different ways.
KK+, AKs, AKo 48.374% to win Twenty eight different ways.
QQ+, AKo 46.055% to win Thirty different ways.
QQ+, AKs, AKo 45.270% to win Thirty four different ways.
22+ 39.457% to win Seventy eight different ways

AA can come in six different ways
KK can come in six different ways
AKo can come in twelve different ways

You would be moving all in 1 in 55.25 hands.

Considering the above, is this an "unbeatable" strategy? By that I mean, with the hands that show a profit in win rate, you don't get them often enough to show a profit, and those with lower win rates lose in the long run anyway.

(And as a reply to the above comment, I realize that poker isn't all math, but its fun for me [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img])