[RocketManJames]

[ QUOTE ]
I like this problem a lot.

But... a big loop hole is specification.

You could come up with one set, or AT MAX 2 sets, that would rank you #1 if you let us get picky.

[/ QUOTE ]

Care to elaborate? I think that this is an interesting subject... and I thought about it quite a bit after a night out drinking.

Also, I'm not asking how many sets you could come up with that you'd be #1 at. I just want to know the minimum number of elements in a set of events that would have you ranked as #1.

-RMJ