No difference based on the assumtion...
[ QUOTE ]
Btw, it's worth mentioning that while the above strategy for B is co-optimal, it's also dominated by the strategy that raise-bluffs the best folding hands rather than the worst ones. Hopefully everyone sees why.
[/ QUOTE ]
If you looked at the assumption made in my previous post
[ QUOTE ]
If A's strategy is:
[0,x] : raise(bluff)
[x,y] : fold
[y,z] : call
[z,1] : raise
And B's strategy is:
[0,a] : fold if raised
[a,1] : call if raised,
where 0<x<y<a<z<1
[/ QUOTE ]
you see that it doesn't matter which hands in [0,y] will be bluffed with,
since z>y anyway!
But if you don't assume A would have thought of that, this would not even
necesserily be B's (co-)optimal strategy I think.
Next Time.
|