View Single Post
  #16  
Old 11-11-2005, 10:41 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: Whats wrong with this statement?

[ QUOTE ]
"The Pennsylvania Academic Standards require students to learn about Darwin's theory of evolution and eventually to take a standardized test of which evolution is a part.

"Because Darwin's theory is a theory, it continues to be tested as new evidence is discovered. The theory is not a fact. Gaps in the theory exist for which there is no evidence. A theory is defined as a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations.

"Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference book, 'Of Pandas and People,' is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves.

"With respect to any theory, students are encouraged to keep an open mind. The school leaves the discussion of the origins of life to individual students and their families. As a standards-driven district, class instruction focuses upon preparing students to achieve proficiency on standards-based assessments."

[/ QUOTE ]

It's wrong because it gives the impression that ID is science.

Instead of

[ QUOTE ]
Intelligent design is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference book, 'Of Pandas and People,' is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what intelligent design actually involves.

[/ QUOTE ]

replace it with

the flying spaghetti monster is an explanation of the origin of life that differs from Darwin's view. The reference site FSM is available for students who might be interested in gaining an understanding of what the flying spaghetti monster actually involves.

You can. Scientifically they are identical.
Reply With Quote