Re: I need PROOF!
[ QUOTE ]
If you or other top players were dumb enough to slum in the 11s for 1000 games (either 1 or 2 tabling) I'd be SHOCKED if you didn't have a 40% ROI. Especially you, since your tendency to avoid fancy plays would be perfect against the donks.
I'm just kind of puzzled by the fact that the OP thinks that an ROI of 30% is unattainable.
If it wasn't for the fact that you'd never do it, I'd put big money on a challenge of this nature BTW.
Hell, I'd put big money on a challenge of me playing say 500 more games at the 11s and hitting 30% over this time. In order to cut down on variance and improve my chances, I'd one table and it would take forever but I'd do it for the right stakes.
[/ QUOTE ]
On the contrary, I clearly say that "I am positive 30% is attainable" in a response and then I go on to say that I am teetering on 30% after now 800 tourneys in the 22s. I am at 28.3 right now after 800. I am trying to get 30% as a personal goal after 1000... then if anyone asks for a screenshot in the future I will be able to provide [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
EDIT: I am doing this 8 tabling in sets... I agree with curtains that it is defintely the best method.
|