Re: Interesting Hands
I probably would have played the hands the exact opposite of how you played them.
Hand #1 you have to know the villian has something by his bet then call of the re-raise on flop. You have outs, I check behind on turn to see if I hit something.
Hand #2 is a call for me most of the time, depending on how tight villian has been playing.
IMO neither of them are standard. Throwing all your money in when you are a dog to win is not standard for me. Folding the probable best hand is not standard for me. Second hand depends a lot on the player, and I dont fault a call or fold here, which means neither can be standard. Why do people always want to know if something is standard?
|