[topspin]

[ QUOTE ]
*sigh* dude i was just giving an idea. i was talking about HU. this isn't a default. i was merely giving a suggestion to a poster asking about his weak-tight tendencies how to answer a possible bluffer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same here. I'm just trying to point out that the instinctive response of pushing back against someone you think is bluffing is often less profitable than sitting back and letting their own aggression work against them.

[ QUOTE ]
to return to the OP: it is very much possible to properly bluff at the proper time the proper amount of times against the proper opponent with the proper table image (yes, i do believe it is possible to have this online).

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't disagree. An earlier post in the thread made a good point that "no bluffing" is often good advice to give newbies, since many usually bluff far too much, but never firing at pots without a big hand also becomes as big a disadvantage as you improve and move up.