Thread: 100 vs 6500
View Single Post
  #23  
Old 07-04-2005, 12:58 AM
JohnnyHumongous JohnnyHumongous is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 382
Default Re: 100 vs 6500

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure I'd want Raymer on my 100 list before Tuan Le.

[/ QUOTE ]

Raymer was a pretty close alternate.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sklansky is dead weight on your list in comparison with Raymer (no offense David). Sklansky doesn't play the megalo- stack-building style that one will need to make a final table of 10 people out of 6500. Even money, I would take Sklansky to finish higher than Raymer. But all else being equal I would take Raymer to catch the final table over Sklansky.
Reply With Quote