I think Ed Miller has it wrong...
I think his book advocates play that increases the variance WAY too much -
I also think it assumes your opponents are morons who go to the river with A high and never assumes they might actually have an A or top pair or set -
while I MIGHT be tempted to open up my game a bit, I find it highly unlikely I will be taking all his comments to fruition to their fullest extent...
discuss amongst yourselves...what have your results been...I'm finding bankroll swings that would require a $3000 bankroll on 2/4 to ride out...
I mean, look even at the discussion boards....the forum is full of people trying the concepts, and looking for justification why they bombed so bad...
something is amiss here, methinks...discuss amongst yourselves
RB
|