Still incorrect
Well, what may have been throwing this thing off and getting us involved in this huge theoretical discussion (from which I've at least learned something) is that this is a faulty strategy for B.
If A keeps his strategy, we have:
A: bluff-raises [0,1/6]
calls a raise [1/3,1]
value-raises [1/2,1]
Then B can improve by basically playing the same way:
B: bluff-raises [0,1/6]
checks-folds [1/6,1/3]
check-calls [1/3,1/2]
value-raises [1/2,1]
I get that B actually wins 1/9 with this strategy. So, B's strategy was not optimal in our previous solutions.
I'm still not sure what A's best counter to this strategy is, though. More on that in another post.
|