[ QUOTE ]
I thought this was the agreed upon correct solution. Posted by wells and agreed to by Bozman?
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...;o=14&vc=1
It has B value raising from 3/4 up to 1 as opposed to the 5/6 up to 1 for problem #3.
Although the Raise by B meets similar conditions as in #3, the Calls do not. So it could make sense for the Calling Interval to change. Both on the low side to folds and the high side to raises. Assuming the Linked to Solution is Correct.
Also Aisthesis, I understand you to say that A's bluffing frequency should be greater than B's because of the pot odds. When A raises B has greater Pot Odds to call. Doesn't Game Theory say the raising frequency should be less in that case?
PairTheBoard
[/ QUOTE ]
I think the one posted by well has at least one error. The solution I posted on 6/5 (which has a lightbulb next to it) is correct except that the value of the game is wrong.
B raises the same amount in both cases, because there's no third bet to consider. If a third bet were included (ie, B could limp-reraise), then the raising amounts would be different. As it stands, A calls to prevent B from bluff-raising, and B value raises half of the times that A will call.
Jerrod