[Aisthesis]

Well, the table in my last post has gotten a fair number of views but no responses yet...

So, I'll try to make it a little more readable. Also, I should note that it is basically designed as a generalization of the Karlsson-Sklansky rankings. These should turn out identical to the stack sizes listed in my table with the exception that my table does NOT give any special calling criteria to the blinds. If a blind hand is an underdog, it is assumed here that it is folded. This shouldn't influence the actual ranking of hands at all, but it will have a small influence on the actual stack-size values (I think I'll actually run the same calculations on a 2-handed situation using my formulae just to see how much difference there is in comparison to K-S).

Anyhow, here's my attempt at putting the table in a more readable form. The column headings refer to number of players at the table (or, potentially in the hand, as the case may be--in which case the column headings correspond to a position with everyone folding to you in that position).

------9-------8------7-------6------5------4-------3
99---7.91----9.15---10.80--13.11--16.59--22.37---33.95
AQo--6.60----7.82---9.46---11.77--15.24--21.05---32.69
88---6.50----7.54---8.92---10.85--13.76--18.61---28.30
AJs--6.43----7.62---9.21---11.44--14.80--20.42---31.68
77---5.39----6.27---7.45---9.11---11.59--15.74---24.03
AJo--4.51----5.38---6.55---8.19---10.66--14.81---23.12
66---4.48----5.24---6.27---7.70---9.86---13.47---20.69
A9s--3.14----3.80---4.67---5.91---7.79---10.94---17.26
A8o--2.07----2.52---3.12---3.97---5.26---7.42----11.78
22---1.97----2.40---2.98---3.80---5.05---7.15----11.37
A6o--1.51----1.85---2.32---3.00---4.02---5.74----9.21
A2o--0.99----1.25---1.62---2.14---2.95---4.31----7.09
KJo--0.85----1.12---1.51---2.08---2.97---4.51----7.68
K7s--0.52----0.71---0.98---1.39---2.04---3.17----5.51
JTs--0.13----0.21---0.36---0.63---1.12---2.09----4.28
K2o--0.20----0.29---0.42---0.63---0.98---1.59----2.90