[stripsqueez]

i wouldn't presume to know who is a better player - but in my view there is plenty of logic behind Brunson's reason as to why he is better

what i have read from Sklansky (being only "The Theory Of Poker" and what i see on this forum) indicates to me that he has a near complete grasp of the scientific and strategic concepts that aid an understanding of the game - that means very little when considering how good he would be at a table filled with other good players - i havent read anything he has written that indicates to me that he has a more profound understanding of the game

stripsqueez - chickenhawk