View Single Post
  #197  
Old 12-24-2005, 01:56 AM
sublime sublime is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston
Posts: 681
Default Re: Johnny Damon signs with Yankees


......I’m not as sure as you appear to be that this move is a good one. There are way too many variables at this point to determine where the value in this deal truly lies. One a pure ‘on-the-field’ baseball level, I don’t like to lose a pretty good shortstop without something that resembles a par-value replacement for him. This is probably one of those deals that will be best judged in hindsight.


renteria is not a pretty good SS anymore, hes competent. its easy to dismiss this as a 'we will have to wait and see deal' but its really not. if the braves had decided to take renterias who contract off the red sox hands with no player returning, the red sox would have done it in a heartbeat. so in essence, the red sox paid 11m for the rights to a potential stud who may be traded again.

......You’re entitled to your opinion that the Yankees ‘overpaid’ for him, but (and no offense intended) it is just your opinion. There are many who strongly disagree with you surrounding the ‘overpaid’ label that you tag on this signing.

yes, except i am right. the diffrence between my opinion and others, is i tend to base mine on pure stats, while others tell what they think, which is more often than not worthless.

damon 'may' not be overpaid the next two seasons (in order for that to be the case, he would have to slightly increase his performanc), but LIKELY (80%+) will be the last two. i have done (and posted) a lot of research to suggest that damon will not age as well as bernie williams, never mind tim raines/ricky henderson.

To a certain degree, evaluation of this deal depends upon at what level you want to analyze it. I put more weight on its’ effect upon the lineup of both teams, and I don’t see how anyone could possibly not see that it’s a positive for the Yankees and a negative for the Sox.

well, for starters the red sox have not replaced him yet. to make comparisons against an empty slot is a little silly.

nd, it’s not ‘all of a sudden’ the team is in a nosedive.....It’s all of a sudden the team does not have a major league shortstop or center-fielder. Short of a Houdini-esque move by the Sox, it’s no wonder that so many Sox fans are worried.

again, its december. would you like to wager with me that joey cora and adam stern are NOT the opening day starters at CF/SS?

This is different front losing Pedro, Lowe and Cabrera. That series of events is something for another string.

???????????

I am not positive that they have contingency plans for Damon leaving.

well its obvious (since it happened) that the red sox had zero intention of signing damon to a 4 year deal at more than 10m, so to suggest that they didnt have backup plans is laughable.

What I mean by this is we can’t ignore the fact that the Yankees are our primary competition in the AL East. This doesn’t mean that the Sox should be fiscally irresponsible and get caught up in a ‘keep up with the Jones’ battle with the Yankees as that, IMO, would be foolhardy and ultimately create more problems that it solves.

ummm, you just made my point about NOT signing damon for me......

I believe what happened with Damon was a battle that could have been won had the Sox not locked themselves into a ‘too narrow’ philosophy and applied it too broadly.

the yankees are the ones who took the too narrow view.....they have to paty this guy when hes 35 13m dollars!!!! how can you suggest the red sox viewed it to narrowly???????

..You’re going to have to explain this statement a bit more to me. What was Damon’s salary this past year with the Sox? Had he signed with the Sox for the same 13M/yr., how would that cost them an extra 80M?

the red cant make deals 'like this' unless they have an extra 80m in payroll. or in other words, the yankees can because they do.


so, again you are basing the 'nosedive' of the red sox on them not signing a 32 year old centerfielder, who has left his prime and isnt 'great' to begin with a 4 year deal for 52m dollars????

right, pure insanity over on yawkey way [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

i wish i was born in san diego or something. the negativity that teams around here have to deal with has got to be close to unbearable. this ownership group has done nothing but good since they came around (including winning a WS), yet they dont even get a month during the offseason to fill two roster spots. they make a bad signing and get roasted (renteria) they get rid of that deal and get roasted. they trade for a 25 year old stud and it gets overlooked because the 'good' CF went to the chief division rival.

the red sox dont have to 'replace' johnny damon to win 95 games next year. they need to fill his spot with a guy who can play at an above average level and wait for the chance to sign the next johnny damon.

so far the rotaion has improved, the bullpen has improved, 2B has improved, 1B has improved (youkillis ipo millar) 3B is probably equal and SS procution shouldnt be hard to replace (in case people didnt noticem renteria was not that good last year) yet instead of focusing on all the good thats been done, the region whines about the yankees signing one of 'our guys'. amazing.
Reply With Quote